Abstract

For several decades, farmers have been mixing rock powders with livestock slurry to reduce its NH3 emissions and increase its nutrient content. However, mixing rock powders with slurry is controversial, and there is currently no scientific evidence for its effects on NH3 and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions or on changes in its nutrient content due to element release from rock powders. The major aim of this study was therefore to analyse the effects of mixing two commercially established rock powders with cattle slurry on NH3, CO2, N2O and CH4 emissions, and on nutrient release over a course of 46 days. We found that rock powders did not significantly affect CO2 emission rates. NH3 and N2O emission rates did not differ significantly up until the end of the trial, when the emission rates of the rock powder treatments significantly increased for NH3 and significantly decreased for N2O, respectively, which coincided with a reduction of the slurry crust. Cumulative NH3 emissions did not, however, differ significantly between treatments. Unexpected and significant increases in CH4 emission rates occurred for the rock powder treatments. Rock powders increased the macro- and micronutrient content of the slurry. The conflicting results are discussed and future research directions are proposed.

Highlights

  • The livestock sector is a major source of ammonia (NH3 ) and greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions

  • For the rock powder treatments NH3 emission rates increased at the end of the trial, which coincided with a reduction in the floating crust

  • We analysed some of the major and hitherto unexamined claims regarding the mixture of rock powders with cattle slurry and found agronomically and environmentally conflicting results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The livestock sector is a major source of ammonia (NH3 ) and greenhouse gas (GHG). Of the total agricultural emissions in the EU in 2017, livestock slurry management contributed the biggest share of the total ammonia (NH3 ) emissions and around 8%. There is ample evidence of the negative consequences of accumulating GHG emissions in the atmosphere [3,4], whereas NH3 emissions can cause atmospheric deposition of nitrogen (N) resulting in the eutrophication of ecosystems, soil acidification and fine particulate air pollution [5,6,7]. There are several policies in place to substantially reduce GHG and NH3 emissions from livestock management. Numerous methods have been suggested and tested to reduce

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call