Abstract

Simple SummaryBacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria are considered good alternatives for feed antibiotics because of inhibiting spoilage microorganisms in silage and non-drug resistance in animals. Owing to the narrow antibacterial spectrum, class I bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria are considered to have limitations as silage inoculants. The research was conducted to evaluate the effects of two class IIa bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus on silage fermentation, microbial population, chemical composition, and aerobic stability. The strains results showed that class IIa bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria could improve silage fermentation quality, reduce counts of molds and yeasts, and improve aerobic stability to a greater extent than inoculation with Lactobacillus plantarum MTD/1, a proven, widely used inoculant, which does not produce bacteriocin. The findings of this research are of great value for current understandings and onwards to conduct further research and for possible practical implementation of class IIa bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria as silage inoculants.The effects of two strains of class IIa bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus delbrueckii F17 and Lactobacillus plantarum (BNCC 336943), or a non-bacteriocin Lactobacillus plantarum MTD/1 (NCIMB 40027), on fermentation quality, microbial counts, and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage were investigated. Alfalfa was harvested at the initial flowering stage, wilted to a dry matter concentration of approximately 32%, and chopped to 1 to 2 cm length. Chopped samples were treated with nothing (control, CON), Lactobacillus delbrueckii F17 (F17), Lactobacillus plantarum (BNCC 336943) (LPB), or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD/1 (NCIMB 40027) (LPN), each at an application rate of 1 × 106 colony-forming units/g of fresh weight. Each treatment was ensiled in quadruplicate in vacuum-sealed polyethylene bags packed with 500 g of fresh alfalfa per bag and ensiled at ambient temperature (25 ± 2 °C) for 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days. The samples were then subjected to an aerobic stability test after 60 days of ensiling. Compared with the CON silage, the inoculants reduced the pH after 14 days of ensiling. After 60 days, pH was lowest in the LPB-treated silage, followed by the F17 and LPN-treated silages. Inoculation of F17 increased concentrations of lactic acid in silages fermented for 7, 14, 30, and 60 days relative to other treatments, except for the LPN-treated silages ensiled for 30 and 60 days, in which the lactic acid concentrations were similar to that of F17 silage. Application of F17 and LPB decreased the number of yeast and mold relative to CON and LPN-treated silages. Compared with the CON silage, inoculant-treated silages had greater aerobic stability, water-soluble carbohydrate, and crude protein concentrations, and lower neutral detergent fiber, amino acid nitrogen, and ammonia nitrogen concentrations. The LPB-treated silage had the greatest aerobic stability followed by the F17-treated silage. Both class IIa bacteriocin producing inoculants improved alfalfa silage fermentation quality, reduced the growth of yeasts and molds, and improved the aerobic stability of the ensiled forage to a greater extent than the proven LPN inoculant. However, higher crude protein concentration and lower ammonia nitrogen concentration were observed in LPN-treated silage relative to other treatments.

Highlights

  • Excessive use of antibiotics has resulted in antibiotic resistance, which is one of the greatest current public health challenges, affecting about 2 million people and killing about 23,000 annually in the United States [1]

  • Extensive research in recent years has revealed the potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as alternatives to feed antibiotics for improving the performance and feed efficiency of animals [4,5,6]

  • The use of LAB to control the growth of spoilage microorganisms is especially important because of their ability to produce bacteriocin, a vital antimicrobial product with biopreservation and antibacterial properties [8,9], which can improve the quality and safety of food and feed [3,10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Excessive use of antibiotics has resulted in antibiotic resistance, which is one of the greatest current public health challenges, affecting about 2 million people and killing about 23,000 annually in the United States [1] This has led to examination of the efficacy of alternative additives that inhibit the growth of undesirable bacteria [2,3]. Extensive research in recent years has revealed the potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as alternatives to feed antibiotics for improving the performance and feed efficiency of animals [4,5,6] Such LAB additives do not cause drug resistance or leave harmful residues and are environmentally friendly, they are widely used in food fermentation and feed processing industries worldwide [7]. A previous study has shown that inoculating forage with bacteriocin-producing bacteria like Lactococcus lactis CECT 539 and Pediococcus acidilactici NRRL B-5627 was more effective than non-bacteriocin control at inhibiting the growth of Listeria monocytogenes [13]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call