Abstract
Microbes can have important impacts on their host's survival. Captive breeding programs for endangered species include periods of captivity that can ultimately have an impact on reintroduction success. No study to date has investigated the impacts of captive diet on the gut microbiota during the relocation process of generalist species. This study simulated a captive breeding program with white‐footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to describe the variability in gut microbial community structure and composition during captivity and relocation in their natural habitat, and compared it to wild individuals. Mice born in captivity were fed two different diets, a control with dry standardized pellets and a treatment with nonprocessed components that reflect a version of their wild diet that could be provided in captivity. The mice from the two groups were then relocated to their natural habitat. Relocated mice that had the treatment diet had more phylotypes in common with the wild‐host microbiota than mice under the control diet or mice kept in captivity. These results have broad implications for our understanding of microbial community dynamics and the effects of captivity on reintroduced animals, including the potential impact on the survival of endangered species. This study demonstrates that ex situ conservation actions should consider a more holistic perspective of an animal's biology including its microbes.
Highlights
The reintroduction and relocation of individuals in the context of species conservation faces many challenges (Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2000; Game, Meijaard, Sheil, & Mcdonald-Madden, 2014; Seddon, Armstrong, & Maloney, 2007), including the fact that individuals released from captive breeding programs often struggle to thrive in their natural habitats (Gilbert, Gardner, Kraaijeveld, & Riordan, 2017; Willoughby & Christie, 2019)
Since the literature gap of the effects on gut bacteria of captive diet during relocation remains unaddressed, we focused on the impact of captive diet for the gut bacteria during the relocation process in a generalist species with an omnivorous diet
This study reports complementary results advocating that captivity does have an impact on the gut microbial communities of generalist rodents like P. leucopus after relocation in their natural habitat
Summary
The reintroduction and relocation of individuals in the context of species conservation faces many challenges (Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2000; Game, Meijaard, Sheil, & Mcdonald-Madden, 2014; Seddon, Armstrong, & Maloney, 2007), including the fact that individuals released from captive breeding programs often struggle to thrive in their natural habitats (Gilbert, Gardner, Kraaijeveld, & Riordan, 2017; Willoughby & Christie, 2019) These difficulties may be caused by adaptations acquired from generations of captivity (SchulteHostedde & Mastromonaco, 2015; Snyder et al, 1996), and disease (Kołodziej-Sobocińska, Demiaszkiewicz, Pyziel, & Kowalczyk, 2018; Viggers, Lindenmayer, & Spratt, 1993) and/or the inability to transition to a native diet (Jules, Leaver, & Lea, 2008; Kleiman, 1989). Peromyscus leucopus does not face major threats of extinction, but its large distribution, short generation time, and high capture–recapture rate in general make it an adequate model to study gut microbiota variation across a short period of time to simulate a captive breeding program for reintroduction purposes
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have