Abstract

Forest certification plays an important role in the global trade of legal, sustainably harvested timber. There is no accurate definition of how international forest certification systems impact international trade from a global perspective. This paper is intended to evaluate the influence of forest certification on international trade, so that it can provide a scientific basis for the improvement of the international forest certification systems and for the development of relevant forestry industries in different countries. First, the influence of forest certification on international trade of forest products is explained in the economic model; hence, four hypotheses are put forward. Second, to test these hypotheses, we verify the panel data of bilateral trade and forest certification of all forest products among 67 economies from 2009 to 2018 by incorporating forest certifications into the gravity model. Finally, tests by country groups and product groups were further analyzed, respectively. The results show that: (1) The extended Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood (PPML) estimation solves the problem of the heteroscedasticity and zero trade value problems of the gravity model well in the forest industry. (2) Forest certification has an export competitive effect, a trade barrier effect, as well as common language effect. (3) Forest certification has asymmetric trade effects. The export competitive effect of forest certification in developing countries is greater than that in developed countries. Forest certification has become a trade barrier for developing countries, especially in the process of trade with developed countries. The common language effect is higher during the trade between developed and developing countries. The export competitive effect of wood products is higher than that of furniture products. Forest certification has trade barrier effect on wood products in developing countries, while it has trade barrier effect on furniture products in developed countries.

Highlights

  • Forest certification began in the early 1990s and intended to address a range of forest sustainability and management issues, including illegal logging, deforestation, biodiversity loss and forestForests 2020, 11, 1270; doi:10.3390/f11121270 www.mdpi.com/journal/forestsForests 2020, 11, 1270 degradation

  • We attempted to compare various estimation methods so as to solve the problems of heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation that usually exist in gravity models

  • The export competitive advantage of wooden products based on forest management (FM) certification is higher than that of furniture products based on Chain of Custody (CoC) certification

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest certification is a voluntary market behavior whereby independent third party “certifiers” assess the quality of forest management and production in accordance with the standards, criterions and principles predefined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) [3]. There are two dominant international forest certification systems: the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC). The authors obtained statistics by year, country, certification type and different forest products. Please ask the authors for the relevant data or statistical procedures if required)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call