Abstract

Both fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and dietary fiber intervention were verified as effective ways to manipulate the gut microbiota, whereas little is known about the influence of the combined methods on gut microbiota. Here, we constructed “non-industrialized” and “industrialized” gut microbiota models to investigate the donor effect of FMT and diet effect in shaping the gut microbiota. Mice were transplanted fecal microbiota from domestic pig and received a diet with low-fiber (D) or high-fiber (DF), whereas the other two groups were transplanted fecal microbiota from wild pig and then received a diet with low-fiber (W) or high-fiber (WF), respectively. Gut microbiota of WF mice showed a lower Shannon and Simpson index (P < 0.05), whereas gut microbiota of W mice showed no significant difference than that of D and DF mice. Random forest models revealed the major differential bacteria genera between four groups, including Anaeroplasma or unclassified_o_Desulfovibrionales, which were influenced by FMT or diet intervention, respectively. Besides, we found a lower out-of-bag rate in the random forest model constructed for dietary fiber (0.086) than that for FMT (0.114). Linear discriminant analysis effective size demonstrated that FMT combined with dietary fiber altered specific gut microbiota, including Alistipes, Clostridium XIVa, Clostridium XI, and Akkermansia, in D, DF, W, and WF mice, respectively. Our results revealed that FMT from different donors coupled with dietary fiber intervention could lead to different patterns of gut microbiota composition, and dietary fiber might play a more critical role in shaping gut microbiota than FMT donor. Strategies based on dietary fiber can influence the effectiveness of FMT in the recipient.

Highlights

  • Gut microbiota contains highly diverse microorganisms, which have metabolic, immune, and protective functions and play a vital role in gut homeostasis, and host health (Goldsmith and Sartor, 2014)

  • There was no significant difference between the mice fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from the domestic pig (D) and received with high dietary fiber (DF) and mice FMT from wild pig (W) groups in Shannon index, Simpson index, and observed species

  • There was no significant difference in alpha diversity index in the gut microbiota between the DF and the D group, whereas the Chao 1 index and observed species of gut microbiota in with high dietary fiber (WF) mice were significantly lower than that of the W mice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gut microbiota contains highly diverse microorganisms, which have metabolic, immune, and protective functions and play a vital role in gut homeostasis, and host health (Goldsmith and Sartor, 2014). Functioning to probiotics, Fiber Shapes Gut Microbiota. FMT success can be defined by a shift in the gut microbiome profile of an individual toward that of the donor (Wilson et al, 2019). Numerous studies have revealed that diet plays an important role in mediating the composition and metabolic function of gut microbiota (Sonnenburg and Bäckhed, 2016). When industrialized and non-industrialized populations were compared, the significant differences within the gut microbiota composition was observed, suggesting that bacterial can be driven by differences in diet, including dietary fiber (De Filippo et al, 2010). Mechanistic studies and clinical trials on isolated and extracted fibers have demonstrated promising regulatory effects on the gut microbiota (Gill et al, 2021)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call