Abstract
AbstractThe growing interest in sustainable, lightweight, bendable roll‐to‐roll manufactured printed electronics applied to packaging, textiles or medical healthcare has led to the need for materials that can withstand various environmental conditions. In this work, the studied materials were polyethylene terephthalate (PET), typically used as a substrate for printed electronics, and it was compared to biobased polymeric substrates bio‐PET, polylactic acid (PLA), cellulose acetate propionate (CAP) and regenerated cellulose film Natureflex™. Films were exposed for 500 h to heat (50.5°C); heat and humidity (50 RH%); heat, humidity, and light (UV‐A 300–400 nm, 42 W/m2) and temperature cycles in the range of −45°C to 65°C. Changes in film transparency and mechanical properties were analyzed. The main findings were that during the exposure to only elevated temperature and temperature with humidity, the analyzed properties were retained in all film materials. UV‐A caused less or no changes in Natureflex™, bio‐PET and PLA. The most stable in thermal cycling was Natureflex™, CAP, and PET. These results may open new possibilities for biopolymers in printed electronics applications.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
