Abstract
Practice bribery case concerning reclamation jakarta uncovered bays where the chairman of the Jakarta City Council Commission D associated with Mohamad Sanusi PT. Agung Podomoro, which makes ironic developer PT. Ocean estuary Wisesa subsidiary PT.AGUNG Podomoro Lan has been marketing the property, Jakarta Bay Reclamation sticking due to the discovery of the alleged bribery practices to the chairman of City Council Commission D of Jakarta, Mohamad Sanusi PT. Agung Podomoro, the bribe was suspected as the discussion of two draft Regional regulations (draft) on the North Coast Capital Reclamation. Here Giving Bribes suspected of violating Article 5 paragraph (1) letter a or Article 5, paragraph (1) or Article 13 of Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended in Act No. 20 of 2001 on the eradication of Corruption junto Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 junto Article 64 paragraph (1) Criminal Code. This study intends to show the facts of corruption and money laundering. research methods with qualitative research approach based on secondary and primary data. The first study showed, was not done due to corruption and transparency monitoring data is not so up to do both, corruption repressive epektif not sufficient deterrent effect against perpetrators. Keywords: Law Imporcement, Effectifity, Corruption
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
