Abstract
Goal. To study the effectiveness of fertilizers and crop rotation factor in controlling weed abundance in winter wheat crops.
 Methods. Long-term field and analytical.
 Results. Research data on the effectiveness of fertilizers and legumes predecessors in controlling weed abundance in winter wheat crops are presented. It has been established that the basis of weeding of winter wheat crops in the spring tillage phase was one- and dicotyledonous species, at the time of harvest — mostly by mass dicotyledonous. In the composition of the weeds, the largest competition for winter wheat crops for light and nutrients was created by Chenopodium album — 3.4—4.3 g/m2, Capsella bursa-pastoris L. — 0.6—4.0, Spergula vulgaris — 0.3—2.9, Fallopia convolvulus — 1.0—1.1 g/ m2. The use of mineral fertilizers significantly reduced the number of weeds in winter wheat crops at the beginning of the growing season and their mass at the time of harvest. Legume predecessors had not significant effect on the dynamics of weed development in winter wheat agrocenosis.
 Conclusions. The application of mineral fertilizers has been identified as an effective measure todecreaseweeds abundance and their mass in winter wheat crops. At the fertilizer doses N60Р60К60 the number of weeds in the spring tillage phase decreased by 6.3—6.5 times as compared to the control without fertilizers, and the mass of weeds at the time of harvest — by 2.6—3.0 times. Under the clover predecessor, the mass of dicotyledonous weeds at the time of harvest compared to the spring vetch was slightly higher with the predominance of Capsella bursa-pastoris L. — 2.5 g/m2 and Chenopodium album — 2.3 g/m2. Increasing the nitrogen dose for winter wheat from 60 to 90 kg/ha only in the clover rotation chain slightly increased the weed mass at the time of harvest. The total weeds mass in comparison with the nitrogen dose of 60 kg/ha increased by 2.7 g/m2.
Highlights
Íàäì3ðíà õ3ì3çàö3ÿ, ÿêà çàáåçïå÷óo îäåðæàííÿ ñòàá3ëüíî âèñîêèõ âðîæà¿â, âîäíî÷àñ ñòâîðþo âèñîêîòåõíîãåííå íàâàíòàæåííÿ íà äîâê3ëëÿ, ïîðóøóo á3îëîã3÷íó ð3âíîâàãó â àãðîåêîñèñòåìàõ, âåäå äî çàáðóäíåííÿðóíòó òà âîäîéìèù, ïîã3ðøóo ÿê3ñòü ñ3ëüñüêîãîñïîäàðñüêî¿ ïðîäóêö3¿ [1,2,3]
Ñ3âîçì3íà, âåäåíà ç óðàõóâàííÿì á3îëîã3÷íèõ îñîáëèâîñòåé áóð’ÿí3â 3 êóëüòóðíèõ ðîñëèí, à òàêîæ åêîëîã3÷íèõ óìîâ, âåëèêîþ ì3ðîþ çàáåçïå÷óo çàõèñò ñ3ëüñüêîãîñïîäàðñüêèõ êóëüòóð â3ä äèêîðîñëèõ øê3äëèâèõ ðîñëèí 3 ñïðèÿo ï3äâèùåííþ âðîæàéíîñò3 âñ3õ âèðîùóâàíèõ êóëüòóð íà 35—60% [8]
Çà ïîïåðåäíèêà êîíþøèíè íåçíà÷íî çðîñòàëà ìàñà äâîäîëüíèõ áóð’ÿí3â íà ìîìåíò çáèðàííÿ ïîð3âíÿíî ç âèêîþ ÿðîþ ç äîì3íóâàííÿì ãðèöèê3â çâè÷àéíèõ (Capsella bursa-pastoris L.) — 2,5 ã/ì2 òà ëîáîäè á3ëî¿ (Chenopodium album) — 2,3 ã/ì2
Summary
Äîñë3äæåííÿ ïîêàçàëè, ùî çà âèðîùóâàííÿ ïøåíèö3 îçèìî¿ ó ëàíö3 ç êîíþøèíîþ áåç çàñòîñóâàííÿ äîáðèâ ÷èñåëüí3ñòü áóð’ÿí3â ñòàíîâèëà 51 øò./ì2, âèêîþ ÿðîþ — 50 øò./ì2. Çà äîçè äîáðèâ ï3ä ïøåíèöþ N60Ð60Ê60 ðÿñí3ñòü áóð’ÿí3â ó ôàç3 âåñíÿíîãî êóùåííÿ, ïîð3âíÿíî ç êîíòðîëåì áåç äîáðèâ, çìåíøèëàñü ó 6,3—6,5 ðàçà çà çàãàëüíî¿ ¿õ ÷èñåëüíîñò3 â îáîõ ëàíêàõ 8 øò./ì2. Íà ïåð3îä çáèðàííÿ âðîæàþ ñåãåòàëüíà ðîñëèíí3ñòü â ïîñ3âàõ ïøåíèö3 îçèìî¿ áóëà ïðåäñòàâëåíà 21 âèäîì áóð’ÿí3â, ó ñêëàä3 ÿêèõ îäíîäîëüíèõ — 2, äâîäîëüíèõ — 15, áàãàòîð3÷íèõ — 4.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have