Abstract

The transition of natural landscapes to agricultural uses has resulted in severe loss of soil organic carbon, significantly contributing to CO2 emissions and rising global temperatures. However, soil has the largest store of terrestrial carbon (C), a considerable sink and effective strategy for climate change mitigation if managed properly. Cover crops (CC) and no-till (NT) management are two management strategies that are known to increase percent organic carbon (%OC); however, adoption of these practices has been low in the mid-South due to lack of region-specific research and resistance to unproven practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of CC-NT treatments in soybean cropping systems on soil percent organic carbon (%OC) and CO2 flux following long-term implementation. Results showed significantly greater %OC in NT (1.27% ± 0.03) than reduced till (RT; 1.10% ± 0.03; p < 0.001) and greater in both CC (rye: 1.23% ± 0.03, rye + clover: 1.22% ± 0.03) than no cover (1.11% ± 0.03; p < 0.001). Bacterial abundance (p = 0.005) and pH (p = 0.006) were significant predictors of %OC. There was no overall significant difference in CO2 flux between tillage or CC treatments; however, there were significant differences between NT and RT in July of 2020 when %RH increased (p < 0.001). Bacterial abundance negatively impacted CO2 flux (p < 0.05), which contradicts most studies. The rate of proportional change and pattern of variability in C pools suggested loss of %OC in RT treatments that were not apparent when considering %OC alone. The results of this study provide valuable insight into C turnover and the effectiveness of CC use in the Mid-South to increase soil C stocks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call