Abstract
Background: The use of commercial mix and tank mix with two or more herbicides is a widespread practice. However, despite its several possible benefits, little is known about its effect on the behavior of the molecules in the soil, which can increase or reduce the leaching potential of these molecules. Objective: This study evaluated the leaching potential of the herbicides diuron and sulfentrazone applied, using commercial mix and tank mix, in soils with different textures. Methods: The herbicides diuron (1,750 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (875 g ha-1) were applied in three soils with different textures (clayey, medium, and sandy), using a commercial mix (Stone®) and a tank mix (Herburon 500 BR + Boral®). Subsequently, the treated soils were reconstituted in soil columns subjected to rainfall simulations with accumulated rainfall volumes of 40, 80, and 120 mm; the leached solutions were collected and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Results: The results indicated a low descending movement of diuron in the three soils evaluated, when applied using commercial and tank mixes with sulfentrazone. Higher rainfall volumes (80 and 120 mm) were required to increase the diuron movement (≈20% of diuron applied). Sulfentrazone showed a high leaching potential in the soils, whereas the tank mix increased the leaching potential in sandy soil with the rainfall depths of 80 and 120 mm. Conclusions: The formulations did not affect the leaching potential of the herbicides in clayey and medium soil. However, the tank mix promoted greater leaching of the herbicides in the sandy soil when compared to the commercial mix.
Highlights
The current agricultural systems depend on the use of herbicides for control of weedy species and reduce possible interferences of these species on the crop development and yield, as in the case of sugarcane crops
Ametryn, amicarbazone, atrazine, clomazone, diclosulam, diuron, glyphosate, imazapic, isoxaflutole, pendimethalin, S-metolachlor, simazine, sulfentrazone, sulfometuron-methyl, tebuthiuron, and trifluralin were found in surface and groundwater and in semi artesian wells in several areas near sugarcane fields in Brazil (Matallo et al, 2003; Gomes et al, 2006; Armas et al, 2007; Santos et al, 2015; Santos et al, 2017)
A completely randomized design with four replications was used, in a 3X2 factorial arrangement consisted of 3 accumulated rainfall depths (40, 80, and 120 mm) and two herbicides formulations, totaling six treatments
Summary
The current agricultural systems depend on the use of herbicides for control of weedy species and reduce possible interferences of these species on the crop development and yield, as in the case of sugarcane crops. Ametryn, amicarbazone, atrazine, clomazone, diclosulam, diuron, glyphosate, imazapic, isoxaflutole, pendimethalin, S-metolachlor, simazine, sulfentrazone, sulfometuron-methyl, tebuthiuron, and trifluralin were found in surface and groundwater and in semi artesian wells in several areas near sugarcane fields in Brazil (Matallo et al, 2003; Gomes et al, 2006; Armas et al, 2007; Santos et al, 2015; Santos et al, 2017) Most of these herbicides applied recurrently are persistent and have moderate to high mobility in soils; they may leach from agricultural areas to groundwaters and represent risks of contamination of the environment. The tank mix promoted greater leaching of the herbicides in the sandy soil when compared to the commercial mix
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.