Abstract
This essay argues that Sweet and Sour Milk, which should be understood as both a political and literary text, does history, which is not to say that it merely tells the history of postcolonial Somalia, but that it participates in a kind of historiography that is, to borrow a phrase Edward Said, both frankly revisionist and fiercely theoretical and intellectually insurrectionary. In this paper, using the theoretical work of a group of Indian historians, collected in the journal of SubalternStudies over the past two decades, I show how Nuruddin Farah's Sweet and Sour Milk uses the trope of silence to dramatize the potentially fruitful (and problematic) process of writing histories from below.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have