Abstract

After the opening up of the banking sector to domestic and foreign capitals which is approved by the Chinese government, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) has permitted city commercial banks to diversify geographically. Since this deregulation in 2006, city commercial banks began to geographically diversify to occupy the market and acquire more financial resources. To examine the causal relationship between geographical diversification and bank performance, we construct an exogenous geographical diversification instrument using the gravity-deregulation model and a policy shock. We find that bank geographical diversification negatively affects bank performance. Moreover, we conduct some mechanism tests in the Chinese context. We find that the target market with several large- and medium-sized banks and a high level of local protectionism in the target market decreases the performance of city commercial banks. Finally, cross-sectional analyses show that the impact of geographical diversification on banks’ performance is more notable among city commercial banks that are younger, and have a lower capital adequacy ratio and a higher non-performing loan ratio.

Highlights

  • China has been experiencing a transition from a planned to a market economy since the 1979

  • Column (5) presents the results for market share; the coefficient of the interaction terms is negative but not significant. These results show that the higher the level of local protectionism in the target market, the worse the performance of city commercial banks

  • We extend our work by examining the impact of geographic diversification changes that resulted from deregulation on bank performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

China has been experiencing a transition from a planned to a market economy since the 1979. We improve this research as follows: First, we develop and implement the gravity model to identify the causal impact of the geographic diversification of city commercial banks’ branches on their performance. We find that in an oligopolistic market, following geographic expansion, local protectionism, and the ownership of city commercial banks could worsen their performance.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call