Abstract

Professors Akira Osuka and Mutsuo Nakamura provide two marvelously rich accounts of Japanese constitutional law.' Professor Osuka's history of Japanese poverty law, for example, and Professor Nakamura's story of the constitutional attacks on economic regulation seem exactly the type of studies we need. Yet their accounts are also a bit troubling: Together, they suggest that scholars may be missing the questions they should most ask, while courts may be missing the answers they should most give.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call