Abstract

Hyphantria cunea Drury is a polyphagous quarantine pest, which is not evolutionarily tied to the territory of Ukraine. We have analyzed data from literary sources on the geographical spreading of Hyphantria cunea Drury, indicated the current area of the pest and noticed factors that influence the acclimatization of a pest. The motherland of Hyphantria cunea Drury is North America; in 1770, an entomologist Druri first described this species. The first indications of the harmfulness of Hyphantria cunea Drury are noted in the USA in 1899 and on the European continent Hyphantria cunea Drury was found near the city of Budapest (Hungary) on the island of Chepel in August 1940. By 1948, the pest had spread throughout Hungary and began to occupy the tree plantations of neighbouring countries, such as the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Yugoslavia, Romania, and Austria. At present, the pest is widespread in Europe, Asia, and North America. In Europe Hyphantria cunea Drury was found in countries such as: Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Georgia, Italy, Moldova, Germany, Russia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey, Hungary, Ukraine, France, Croatia, and the Czech Republic. In 1945 Hyphantria cunea Drury was found in Japan, in the parks of Tokyo. In 1979 – in China in Liaoning Province and in Southern Korea it was first described in 1958. In 2003, small foci of caterpillars of Hyphantria cunea Drury were found in Wellington (New Zealand). In Russia, the first foci of mass reproduction of Hyphantria cunea Drury were discovered in the forests of Krasnodar Krai in Krasnodar and Abinsk forest enterprises in 1976 on an area of 270 hectares. In Ukraine, the first foci of Hyphantria cunea Drury were found in Transcarpathia in 1952, in June, virtually all over the lowlands of the region. In the Northeastern part of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, in Sumy region in particular, Hyphantria cunea Drury was first registered in 2010. In Kharkiv region Hyphantria cunea Drury was discovered at the beginning of 80s of XX century. This article highlights the peculiarities of spreading of Hyphantria cunea Drury and its harmfulness. We have also established the ways of penetration and the current area of pest spreading in Ukraine and in the world. We have carried out the analysis of spreading data of the regulated pest in the territory of Ukraine and in the world, including in the territory of Kharkiv region and the factors, which influence the pest acclimatization have been noted.

Highlights

  • Losses caused to agriculture by pests, weeds and plants diseases are extremely high

  • The primary area of Hyphantria cunea Drury is located on the North American continent from the Pacific to the Atlantic coast, and in the latitudinal direction – from the southern border of coniferous forests of Canada to the state border of the USA and Mexico

  • By 1948, the pest had spread throughout Hungary and began to occupy the tree plantations of neighboring countries, such as the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Yugoslavia, Romania and Austria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Losses caused to agriculture by pests, weeds and plants diseases are extremely high. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the world’s losses because of them every year are around 20–25% of the world’s potential food crop yield (Yemec, 2014). Biological invasions of different organisms have caused enormous changes in ecosystems (Kuznecov, 2010) Scientists in their studies note that one of these species is Hyphantria cunea Drury – polyphagous quarantine pest, one of the most common in Ukraine. In Ukraine the nutrition of Hyphantria cunea Drury is recorded on more than 250 species of fruit and ornamental breeds, and it is characterized as extremely aggressive and dangerous harmful organism which causes great damage to perennial plantations. This pest causes the greatest damage to ash-leaved maple, mulberry tree, apple tree, pear tree, plum, quince-tree, bird-cherry, walnut The presence of sufficient forage base determines the duration of development, viability, mass of caterpillars and pupae, as well as the fertility of butterflies ((Nady, Rcichart & Ubrizsy, 1953; Nordin, Rennels & Maddox, 1972; Shestopalov, 2012, Stankevych, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call