Abstract

Carbon cycling responses of ecosystems to global warming will likely be stronger in cold ecosystems where many processes are temperature‐limited. Predicting these effects is difficult because air and soil temperatures will not change in concert, and will affect above and belowground processes differently. We disentangled above and belowground temperature effects on plant C allocation and deposition of plant C in soils by independently manipulating air and soil temperatures in microcosms planted with either Leucanthemopsis alpina or Pinus mugo seedlings. Daily average temperatures of 4 or 9°C were applied to shoots and independently to roots, and plants pulse‐labelled with 14 CO 2. We traced soil CO 2 and 14 CO 2 evolution for 4 days, after which microcosms were destructively harvested and 14C quantified in plant and soil fractions. In microcosms with L. alpina, net 14C uptake was higher at 9°C than at 4°C soil temperature, and this difference was independent of air temperature. In warmer soils, more C was allocated to roots at greater soil depth, with no effect of air temperature. In P. mugo microcosms, assimilate partitioning to roots increased with air temperature, but only when soils were at 9°C. Higher soil temperatures also increased the mean soil depth at which 14C was allocated. Our findings highlight the dependence of C uptake, use, and partitioning on both air and soil temperature, with the latter being relatively more important. The strong temperature‐sensitivity of C assimilate use in the roots and rhizosphere supports the hypothesis that cold limitation on C uptake is primarily mediated by reduced sink strength in the roots. We conclude that variations in soil rather than air temperature are going to drive plant responses to warming in cold environments, with potentially large changes in C cycling due to enhanced transfer of plant‐derived C to soils.

Highlights

  • In terrestrial ecosystems, most carbon (C) cycling processes are temperature-­sensitive, with lower rates observed at low temperature

  • Root 14C decreased steeply with soil depth in all air and soil temperature combinations (p < 0.001), but this effect was less regular when both air and soil were at 4°C and 14C amounts were highest in the middle soil layer

  • Soil 14C approximately followed the distribution of root 14C (Table 2); similar to root 14C, soil 14C decreased least when both air and soil were cold; this manifested in a significant depth × air temperature × soil temperature interaction (p < 0.01)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Most carbon (C) cycling processes are temperature-­sensitive, with lower rates observed at low temperature. The temperature sensitivity of isolated processes such as photosynthesis and respiration are relatively well studied (e.g., Davidson & Janssens, 2006; Yamori, Hikosaka, & Way, 2014) How these individual responses combine in complex natural ecosystems under realistic scenarios is less well understood, and the ultimate consequences of climate warming for future C cycling and ecosystem functioning remain difficult to predict (Chapin et al, 2009). Air and soil temperature are expected to change differently with climate change (Jungqvist, Oni, Teutschbein, & Futter, 2014; Zhang, Chen, Smith, Riseborough, & Cihlar, 2005) It is often unclear how future temperature regimes should most realistically be simulated (Hoch, 2013; Pumpanen, Heinonsalo, Rasilo, Villemot, & Ilvesniemi, 2012). Be a more important determinant of C allocation than aboveground temperature

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call