Abstract

Simple SummaryRecently, the availability of a high-throughput milk analyzer performing a partial differential somatic cell count (DSCC) opened new opportunities in investigations on bovine udder health. The information supplied by this new tool would be of importance in cows with a very low somatic cell count (SCC ≤ 50,000 cells/mL). Our investigation confirmed that the repeatability of the measurement allows its use under field conditions. The observational data did not find an association between DSCC and intramammary infections in very low SCC cows. However, our data showed that all the major milk components decreased as the DSCC was raised. These findings confirmed that DSCC could be a new informative tool for dairy farmers to monitor the changes in milk quality. DSCC may be suggested as a marker to identify early changes in milk composition, as a result of an alteration in milk secretion mechanisms.The recent availability of a high-throughput milk analyzer performing a partial differential somatic cell count (DSCC) opened new opportunities in investigations on bovine udder health. This analyzer has a potential limitation on the accuracy of measurements when the somatic cell count (SCC) is below 50,000 cells/mL, values characterizing a good proportion of lactating cows in many herds. We obtained data for cows below this threshold, assessed the repeatability of these measurements and investigated the relationship between DSCC and udder health, milk composition and yield. Overall, 3022 cow milk test records performed on a Fossomatic™ 7/DC (Foss A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) were considered; 901 of them had an SCC ≤ 50,000 cells/mL. These latter samples were analyzed by qPCR to identify the presence of bacteria. Overall, 20.75% of the samples (187) were positive. However, the health status did not have any significant association with DSCC. The analysis of the association of DSCC on milk fat, protein and casein showed a significant decrease in their proportions as the DSCC increased, whereas it was not observed for milk yield and lactose. Therefore, DSCC in very low SCC cows may be suggested as a marker to identify early changes in milk composition.

Highlights

  • The current most simple, practical and sustainable method to monitor udder health in dairy herds is represented by individual somatic cell count (SCC), even if it does not have the same accuracy as Animals 2020, 10, 604; doi:10.3390/ani10040604 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2020, 10, 604 microbiological analysis [1,2]; SCC can only suggest the presence of inflammation, but not the presence of a pathogen

  • The first step of our study aimed to estimate the CV% of the SCC and differential somatic cell count (DSCC) in samples with

  • The data shows that the CV% ranged between 3% and 7% for DSCC, values that are close to the ones calculated for SCC in the same samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The current most simple, practical and sustainable method to monitor udder health in dairy herds is represented by individual somatic cell count (SCC), even if it does not have the same accuracy as Animals 2020, 10, 604; doi:10.3390/ani10040604 www.mdpi.com/journal/animalsAnimals 2020, 10, 604 microbiological analysis [1,2]; SCC can only suggest the presence of inflammation, but not the presence of a pathogen. The current most simple, practical and sustainable method to monitor udder health in dairy herds is represented by individual somatic cell count (SCC), even if it does not have the same accuracy as Animals 2020, 10, 604; doi:10.3390/ani10040604 www.mdpi.com/journal/animals. Milk composition changes were observed even below 100,000 cells/mL [9,12,13,14] This evidence supported the research aiming to apply differential somatic cell count (DSCC) as a tool to identify mastitis in combination with SCC or alone. Microscopy is the conventional method to perform DSCC, but it is time consuming and it has poor repeatability, while flow cytometry is more efficient, but the cost of the analysis and its accuracy are critical points that prevent its application outside the research field [15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.