Abstract

이 연구는 2015 개정 실과 교육과정에 따른 ‘창의적인 제품 만들기’ 활동 과제를 개발하고 그 적합도를 분석하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해서 ‘창의적인 제품 만들기’ 활동 과제의 개발 기준을 설정하여 15개의 창의적인 제품 만들기 활동 과제를 개발한 후, 내용 타당도 비율을 구하여 타당도를 검증하였다. 타당도를 검증받은 12개의 활동 과제를 대상으로 창의적 아이디어 창출, 재료 활용, 학생 수준 측면에서 적합도를 조사하였다. 활동 과제별 적합도 평균 점수는 5점 만점에 4.19∼3.78점으로 분포하여 적합한 수준으로 판정되었다. 적합도 평균 점수는 ‘스마트폰 받침대 만들기(4.19)’, ‘연필꽂이 만들기(4.01)’, ‘애완동물 자동 급식기 만들기(3.99)’와 ‘가습기 만들기(3,99)’, ‘골판지 가방 만들기(3.95)’, ‘메모판 만들기(3.94)’와 ‘물시계 만들기(3.94)’, ‘캠핌용 도마 만들기(3.92)’와 ‘동전 분류 저금통 만들기(3.92)’, ‘독서대 만들기(3.91)’, ‘화분 자동 급수기 만들기(3.86)’, ‘도어 스토퍼 만들기(3.78)’의 순으로 확인되었다. 창의적 아이디어 창출 관점에서 알아본 활동 과제의 적합도는 5점 만점에 4.22∼3.75점, 재료 활용 측면에서 확인한 활동 과제의 적합도는 5점 만점에 4.17∼3.69점, 학생 수준 관점에서 조사한 활동 과제의 적합도는 5점 만점에 4.24∼3.56점으로 분포하여 각각의 관점에서 적합한 수준으로 판정되었다.This study was conducted to develop activities for making creative products and to analyze the suitability of these hands on activities. To develop activities for making creative products three criteria were set up based on the analysis of the practical arts curriculum and textbook. According to these criteria fifteen hands on activities were developed and the validity of twelve activities was verified by the content validity ratio. The suitability of the twelve activities was tested in terms of creativity of the idea, use of materials, and developmental levels of students. The overall suitability of twelve activities was verified with 3.78∼4.19 points awarded out of 5. The hands on activities in order of suitability mean score were as follows. Making a smart-phone cradle 4.19, making a pencil holder 4.01, making an automatic pet feeding device 3.99, making a humidifier 3.99, making a cardboard bag 3.95, making a memo board 3.94, making a water clock 3.94, making a chopping board for camping 3.92, making a coin sorting bank 3.92, making a reading desk 3.91, making an automatic pot waterer 3.86, and making a door stopper 3.78. The suitability of the twelve activities was verified with 3.75∼4.22 points in terms of idea creativity, 3.69∼4.17 points in terms of material usage, and 3.56∼4.24 points in terms of the students developmental level.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.