Abstract

ABSTRACT Variability is often underrepresented in (early) statistics classroom. We distinguish two different conceptualizations of variability: Variability as deviation from a center and variability as distance between boundaries. We argue that instruction on the boxplot is predestined to acquire the latter understanding. Conversely, this understanding is part of a comprehensive conceptual knowledge about boxplots. If this understanding is lacking, this leads to a systematic error in the interpretation of boxplots. We developed a digital learning environment assuming that enhanced variability-focused cognitive activities during learning indicate the acquisition of the necessary conceptual knowledge. We conducted an intervention study (N = 195) and using a structural equation model, we found – in line with our hypothesis – that a problem type in which variability, rather than central tendency, was predominantly relevant to the solution leads to higher gain in conceptual knowledge on the boxplot mediated by enhanced variability-focused cognitive activities.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.