Abstract
Simple SummaryCurrent estimates have determined that one in five reptile species are already threatened with extinction. The aim of this study was to determine if pregnant mare serum gonadotropin could be used in leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius) to stimulate the production of sperm and increase their testosterone concentrations. This information may aid in the development of breeding programs for endangered gecko species in the future that will be useful for conservation efforts. Our results demonstrated that this hormone did stimulate sperm production and increased testicular size in leopard geckos. However, it did not increase testosterone concentrations under the current conditions between October–December in the Northern hemisphere. Ultimately, future studies are needed to further characterize the annual reproductive cycle of leopard geckos.Reptiles are highly susceptible to anthropogenic activities as a result of their narrow geographical ranges and habitat specialization, making them a conservation concern. Geckos represent one of the mega-diverse reptile lineages under pressure; however, limited assisted reproductive technologies currently exist for these animals. Exogenous pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) has been found to exhibit follicle stimulating hormone-like action and has been routinely used to alter reproductive hormones of vertebrates in assisted reproductive protocols. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of serial injections of 20 IU and 50 IU PMSG on circulating testosterone concentrations, testicular dynamics, and semen production in a model species of gecko. Twenty-four captive-bred, adult, male leopard geckos (Eublepharis macularius) were divided into three treatment groups and administered a once-weekly injection of either PMSG or saline for a total of nine weeks. Ultrasonographic testicular measurements, electrostimulation for semen collection, and venipuncture were performed on days 0, 21, 42, and 63. Right unilateral orchidectomies and epididymectomies were performed in all animals on day 63; tissues were submitted for histopathology. PMSG treated geckos had significantly higher testicular volumes and weights, spermatozoa motility, and spermatozoa concentrations compared with controls. However, there were no significant differences in testosterone concentrations by treatment or time. Under the conditions outlined, PMSG is effective at stimulating spermatogenesis and increasing testicular size, but not effective at increasing testosterone concentrations in the leopard gecko between October–December in the Northern hemisphere.
Highlights
Geckos are one of three extant mega-diverse lineages of squamate reptiles originating from the major radiations that began diversifying around 200 million years ago [1]
Testicular volumes by ultrasound were significantly larger (p = 0.011) in the 20 IU treatment group compared to baseline
There was no significant difference in testicular volume by ultrasound between the 50 IU and control groups (p = 0.107) or the 50 IU and 20 IU groups (p = 0.272)
Summary
Geckos are one of three extant mega-diverse lineages of squamate reptiles originating from the major radiations that began diversifying around 200 million years ago [1]. While most gecko species have only been discovered over the last 40 years, as new molecular technologies are developed to aid in our understanding of gecko diversity, many species may already have gone extinct [1]. Reptiles are especially susceptible to anthropogenic threats, including habitat loss and degradation, unsustainable trade, introduced invasive species, environmental pollution, and climate change [3,4,5]. Extinction model estimates that include expected climate changes and habitat losses suggest that as many as 76% of reptiles will be committed to future extinctions by 2050 [6], while current estimates have determined that one in five reptile species are already threatened with extinction [3]. Due to the rigorous and time intensive process of determining a species’ conservation status, counts of “officially” recognized endangered and threatened species are likely to grossly underestimate the actual number of imperiled species [4]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
