Abstract

In circuit theory, it is well known that a linear feedback shift register (LFSR) circuit generates pseudorandom bit sequences (PRBS), including an M-sequence with the maximum period of length. In this study, we tried to detect M-sequences known as a pseudorandom sequence generated by the LFSR circuit from time series patterns of stimulated action potentials. Stimulated action potentials were recorded from dissociated cultures of hippocampal neurons grown on a multielectrode array. We could find several M-sequences from a 3-stage LFSR circuit (M3). These results show the possibility of assembling LFSR circuits or its equivalent ones in a neuronal network. However, since the M3 pattern was composed of only four spike intervals, the possibility of an accidental detection was not zero. Then, we detected M-sequences from random spike sequences which were not generated from an LFSR circuit and compare the result with the number of M-sequences from the originally observed raster data. As a result, a significant difference was confirmed: a greater number of “0–1” reversed the 3-stage M-sequences occurred than would have accidentally be detected. This result suggests that some LFSR equivalent circuits are assembled in neuronal networks.

Highlights

  • The brain is recognized as a very large-scale network system in which the basic element is a neuron [1,2,3,4]

  • We investigate M-sequences from the time course of stimulated action potentials in neuronal networks grown on an multielectrode arrays (MEAs) and discuss the linear feedback shift register (LFSR) circuit assemblies in neuronal networks from the detected M-sequence patterns

  • M-sequence patterns detected from interval shuffle were recognized as accidental detections, and they were not generated from LFSR circuits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The brain is recognized as a very large-scale network system in which the basic element is a neuron [1,2,3,4]. In recent studies of the memory mechanism in the brain, investigating a formation of information communication is more essential than specifying the region of memory in the brain [4]. The basic study of communication method in the brain is to clarify the coding mechanism of information. Varieties of coding for neuronal information, for example, rate code, were proposed in previous studies [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The first theory of information architecture is cell-assembly theory proposed by Hebb in 1949 [16, 17]. Rolston and others have observed a robust set of spontaneously repeating spatiotemporal patterns of neuronal activity using a template matching algorithm [22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call