Abstract
Localizing small damages often requires sensors be mounted in the proximity of damage to obtain high Signal-to-Noise Ratio in system frequency response to input excitation. The proximity requirement limits the applicability of existing schemes for low-severity damage detection as an estimate of damage location may not be known a priori. In this work it is shown that spatial locality is not a fundamental impediment; multiple small damages can still be detected with high accuracy provided that the frequency range beyond the first five natural frequencies is utilized in the Frequency response functions (FRF) curvature method. The proposed method presented in this paper applies sensitivity analysis to systematically unearth frequency ranges capable of elevating damage index peak at correct damage locations. It is a baseline-free method that employs a smoothing polynomial to emulate reference curvatures for the undamaged structure. Numerical simulation of steel-beam shows that small multiple damages of severity as low as 5% can be reliably detected by including frequency range covering 5–10th natural frequencies. The efficacy of the scheme is also experimentally validated for the same beam. It is also found that a simple noise filtration scheme such as a Gaussian moving average filter can adequately remove false peaks from the damage index profile.
Highlights
Structural health monitoring (SHM) utilizes vibrational characteristics of the structure for damage detection
Since the effectiveness of the Frequency response functions (FRF) curvature method relies on the chosen frequency range of FRFs, various frequency ranges such as f0, f1, f2, and fWR as mentioned earlier, are investigated for every scenario
This paper presented a baseline-free FRF curvature method that is tested numerically and validated experimentally on beam-type structures using sparse measurement data
Summary
Structural health monitoring (SHM) utilizes vibrational characteristics of the structure for damage detection. These characteristics are described by modal parameters such as natural frequency, mode shapes, modal curvature and modal strain energy. The damage is indicated by precise measurement of the slight deviations in modal parameters values with reference to their nominal range for an ideal healthy structure. This change in modal parameters is often attributed to stiffness loss which indicates the damage along with its location and severity. Early stage damages, typically less severe in nature, would go undetected in several real-life scenarios
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have