Abstract

BackgroundThe autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allow normal data to be released without manual verification. With new advances in medical informatics, the laboratory information system (LIS) has growing potential for the autoverification, allowing rapid and accurate verification of clinical laboratory tests. The purpose of the study is to develop and evaluate a LIS-based autoverification system for validation and efficiency.MethodsAutoverification decision rules, including quality control, analytical error flag, critical value, limited range check, delta check and logical check, as well as patient’s historical information, were integrated into the LIS. Autoverification limited range was constructed based on 5 and 95% percentiles. The four most commonly used coagulation assays, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time (TT), and fibrinogen (FBG), were followed by the autoverification protocols. The validation was assessed by the autoverification passing rate, the true-positive cases, the true-negative cases, the false-positive cases, the false-negative cases, the sensitivity and the specificity; the efficiency was evaluated in the turnaround time (TAT).ResultsA total of 157,079 historical test results of coagulation profiles from January 2016 to December 2016 were collected to determine the distribution intervals. The autoverification passing rate was 77.11% (29,165/37,821) based on historical patient data. In the initial test of the autoverification version in June 2017, the overall autoverification passing rate for the whole sample was 78.75% (11,257/14,295), with 892 true-positive cases, 11,257 true-negative cases, 2146 false-positive cases, no false-negative cases, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83.99%. After formal implementation of the autoverification system for 6 months, 83,699 samples were assessed. The average overall autoverification passing rate for the whole sample was 78.86% and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the passing rate was [78.25, 79.59%]. TAT was reduced from 126 min to 101 min, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test).ConclusionsThe autoverification system for coagulation assays based on LIS can halt the samples with abnormal values for manual verification, guarantee medical safety, minimize the requirements for manual work, shorten TAT and raise working efficiency.

Highlights

  • The autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allow normal data to be released without manual verification

  • A significant answer for this issue may be autoverification, which is a set of well-designed rules with an aim to stop the samples with abnormal values for manual verification and at the same time permit those with normal values to be released without manual intervention [2]

  • If the results were considered to be critical values, they were quickly released to the hospital information system (HIS), and the clinicians were alerted to the abnormalities by a call

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The autoverification system for coagulation consists of a series of rules that allow normal data to be released without manual verification. Previous reports have demonstrated that autoverification can ensure medical safety [3], shorten turnaround time (TAT) [2,3,4,5], reduce labour requirements [2,3,4], improve operational efficiency [2, 4,5,6] and minimize error rate [2], as well as enable laboratory technologists to devote more attention to test results with greater potential error [2] Until recently, those autoverification systems were commonly developed via third party commercial software or middleware, which are costly, and the autoverification decision rules were proprietary, such that no revision could be made according to the user’s requirements [7,8,9,10]. With the progress of laboratory automation, it is challenging to achieve interconnection and intercommunication between analytical instruments and the laboratory information system (LIS) to design within-laboratory autoverification systems independent of any commercial software

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call