Abstract

Third instar larvae of members of the Ceratitis FAR complex, including Ceratitis fasciventris (Bezzi), Ceratitis anonae Graham, and Ceratitis rosa Karsch are described and compared with those of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). Diagnostic characters, such as presence vs. absence of a secondary tooth on the mandibles, previously used to separate Ceratitis capitata from Ceratitis rosa, are shown to vary in each species. Significant variation in diagnostic morphological characters among populations of Ceratitis rosa from east and south Africa is documented; however, the differences are not simply congruent with the R1 and R2 designations based on other studies. Quantitative measures of numerous morphological characters are consistently smaller in the larvae of Ceratitis fasciventris and distinguish them from other species of the FAR complex. Larvae of Ceratitis capitata can be distinguished from those of the FAR complex by characters such as absence of accessory plates of the oral ridges, the shape of the anterior spiracle, and the pattern of dorsal spinules. Previous studies indicated that absence of accessory lobes separate the genus Ceratitis from Bactrocera, but this is shown to be incorrect, as accessory lobes are in fact present in several species of Ceratitis.

Highlights

  • Members of the Ceratitis FAR complex, including Ceratitis fasciventris (Bezzi), Ceratitis anonae Graham, and Ceratitis rosa Karsch, are serious agricultural pests in large parts of Africa

  • One goal of this paper is to describe morphological variation among geographic populations of C. rosa

  • Larval stages of numerous fruit fly species have been described, very few are based on wide geographic sampling, and often they are based on colony material

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Members of the Ceratitis FAR complex, including Ceratitis fasciventris (Bezzi), Ceratitis anonae Graham, and Ceratitis rosa Karsch, are serious agricultural pests in large parts of Africa. ‘Habanero’) that had been shipped from the Netherlands and intercepted in Miami, Florida in August, 2004 It wasn’t clear whether they were C. rosa or Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) because of poorly documented overlapping morphological variation in these two species that confounded the identification process. It was quickly discovered that larvae from the Kenyan colony of C. rosa differed in a significant feature from those of a South African colony as described by Carroll (1998). This prompted a broader study of immature stages of all three species of the FAR complex and their various populations as described here

Materials and methods
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call