Abstract
Corrigendum to “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology”
Highlights
In the article titled “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology” [1], there were missing cases in Tables 1 and 2
E fourth paragraph in the results section, “Uterine artery PI and RI mean values were 1,42 and 0,67 in abnormal placental histology group. They were 12, 1,02, and 0,56% in order (P < 0.01).” should be changed to “Uterine artery PI and RI mean values were 1.49 and 0.66 in the abnormal placental histology group
E second paragraph in the discussion section, “But in our study there was no significant difference among two groups for birth weights.” should be changed to “In concordance with the previous finding, we reported significant difference among the two groups for birth weight.”
Summary
In the article titled “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology” [1], there were missing cases in Tables 1 and 2. E fourth paragraph, “Uterine artery PI and RI mean values were 1,42 and 0,67 in abnormal placental histology group. They were 12, 1,02, and 0,56% in order (P < 0.01).” should be changed to “Uterine artery PI and RI mean values were 1.49 and 0.66 in the abnormal placental histology group.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call