Abstract
In our paper in Figure 34A and in the text (page 73), we incorrectly attributed a portion of the angular to the dentary as a process “ventral to the external mandibular fenestra,” as occurs in some crocodylomorphs. Th e dentary in Kaprosuchus lacks a posteroventral process and only has a posterodorsal process dorsal to the external mandibular fenestra (Fig. 1). Th e angular, which forms the entire ventral margin of the fenestra, is marked by a prominent ridge at mid length and is completely coossifi ed with the prearticular. Th is correction alters the scoring of a single character in our paper (character 181: dentary extension beneath mandibular fenestra; Appendix, p. 124). With Kaprosuchus correctly scored with state 1 (absent), rather than state 0 (present) as in the original Appendix (p. 138), our original phylogenetic trees (Fig. 43) remain unchanged. Tree length (985 steps), however, is one step shorter than initially reported (986 steps). Th e erroneous state had been interpreted as an autapomorphy for Kaprosuchus. ZooKeys 29: 73–74 (2009) doi: 10.3897/zookeys.29.368 www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys
Highlights
The angular, which forms the entire ventral margin of the fenestra, is marked by a prominent ridge at mid length and is completely coossified with the prearticular. This correction alters the scoring of a single character in our paper
With Kaprosuchus correctly scored with state 1, rather than state 0 as in the original Appendix (p. 138), our original phylogenetic trees (Fig. 43) remain unchanged
The erroneous state had been interpreted as an autapomorphy for Kaprosuchus
Summary
Corrigenda: Sereno PC, Larsson HCE (2009) Cretaceous Crocodyliforms from the Sahara. 1 Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA 2 Redpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada 1) Sutural error in the lower jaw
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have