Abstract
This quantitative analytical study aims to discuss; the statistically significant differences in the measurement corresponding standard error of the internal consistency coefficient, for Raven' scores of successive matrix tests, which are attributed to: the studies characteristics that used the test. The relationship between the sample size and the internal consistency coefficient of successive matrix test scores, and finally the relationship between the coherence coefficient of internal consistency, the standard error of measurement and the standard deviation in Raven successive matrix tests. The study adopted the descriptive approach using Mata-analysis, and the use of the Fasha-Haas method for post-analysis to confirm the scores of Raven successive matrix tests. The study population consisted of (249) Arab and foreign studies that applied Raven successive matrices tests. The study sample consisted of (56) Arab and foreign studies which applied successive matrix tests. The findings revealed that; there is no statistically significant differences (p>.05) in the internal consistency coefficients and SEM due to the gender. However, there were statistically significant differences (p<.05) between the studies of the RPMT in the internal consistency coefficients and SEM due to the environment of the test administration, age category, and type of the RPMT. Further, the size of the reliability coefficient is not influenced by the size of the sample. Yet, there was a statistically significant (p< .05) positive relationship between sample size and SEM. Also, a statistically significant (p< .05) negative relationship was found between the size of the reliability coefficient and the SEM after controlling for standard deviation of the test scores. Keywords: meta-analysis, sequential matrices, stability coefficient, re-application, standard errors.
Highlights
The findings revealed that; there is no statistically significant differences (p>.05) in the internal consistency coefficients and SEM due to the gender
ٚرظٙو ٔزبئظ اٌلهاٍخ أٔٗ لا رٛعل ػلالخ كاٌخ إؽظبئ١ب ػٕل َِز ٜٛألً ِٓ ( ),0,6ث ٓ١ؽغُ اٌؼٕ١خ ِٚؼبًِ الارَبق اٌلافٍ٘ٚ ٟنٖ إٌز١غخ رزفك ِغ كهاٍخ( ،)Leach et al, 2006اٌز ٟثٕ١ذ أْ ِؼبًِ اٌضجبد لا ٠زأصو ثّملاه ؽغُ اٌؼٕ١خِ ٛ٘ٚ ،ب أشبهد إٌ ِٓ ٗ١عبٔت آفو اٌلهاٍبد إٌظو٠خ فٟ اٌم١بً ِضً كهاٍخ (ٚ )Yurdugul, 2008اٌز ٟأظٙود أْ ؽغُ اٌؼٕ١خ لا ٠ؤصو ػٍ ٝلّ١خ ِؼبًِ اٌضجبد ٚإّٔب ٠ؤصو ػٍ ٝكلزٗ ،وّب رمبً ثّملاه اٌقطأ اٌّؼ١بهٌٍ ٞم١بً٘ٚ ،نا ِب رج ٓ١فٔ ٟزبئظ اٌلهاٍخ اٌؾبٌ١خ ف ٟأْ ( ِٓ )٪901اٌزجب ٓ٠ف ٟالأفطبء اٌّؼ١به٠خ ٌٍم١بً ث ٓ١اٌلهاٍبد ٠فَوٖ
Summary
٠زج ِٓ ٓ١علٚي ( )4أْ ٕ٘بن فوٚلب ماد كلاٌخ إؽظبئ١خ ثِ ٓ١زٍٛط ٟاٌج١ئخ اٌؼوث١خ ٚاٌج١ئخ الأعٕج١خ ػٕل َِز ٜٛكلاٌخ ألً ِٓ ( ),0,6ف ٟاٌقطأ اٌّؼ١بهٌٍ ٞم١بً لافزجبهاد اٌّظفٛفبد اٌّززبثؼخ ٌو٠فٓ ف ٟارغبٖ اٌج١ئخ اٌؼوث١خ ،ؽ١ش أْ ( ِٓ )٪9101اٌزجب ٓ٠ف ٟالأفطبء اٌّؼ١به٠خ ٌٍم١بً إٌّبظوح ٌّؼبِلاد صجبد الارَبق اٌلافٍ ٟث ٓ١اٌلهاٍبد اٌز ٟرٕبٌٚذ افزجبهاد اٌّظفٛفبد اٌّززبثؼخ ٌو٠فٓ ٠فَوٖ الافزلاف ف ٟث١ئخ اٌزطج١ك٘ٚ ،نا ّ٠ضً ؽغُ أصو وج١و ٚفك رظٕ١ف وٓ١٘ٛ
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
