Abstract

Objective: To study the effectiveness of an integrated intervention of health worker training, a low-cost ecological mosquito ovitrap, and community engagement on Aedes spp. mosquito control over 10 months in 2015 in an urban remote community in Guatemala at risk of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus transmission. Methods: We implemented a three-component integrated intervention consisting of: web-based training of local health personnel in vector control, cluster-randomized assignment of ecological ovillantas or standard ovitraps to capture Aedes aegypti mosquito eggs, and community engagement to promote participation of community members and health personnel in the understanding and maintenance of ovitraps for mosquito control. The intervention was implemented in local collaboration with the Ministry of Health’s Vector Control Programme, and in international collaboration with the National Institute of Public Health in Mexico. Findings: Eighty percent of the 25 local health personnel enrolled in the training programme received accreditation of their improved knowledge of vector control. Significantly more eggs were trapped by ecological ovillantas than standard ovitraps over the 10 month (42 week) study period (t=5.2577; p<0.05). Among both community members and health workers, the levels of knowledge, interest, and participation in community mosquito control and trapping increased. Recommendations for enhancing and sustaining community mosquito control were identified. Conclusion: Our three-component integrated intervention proved beneficial to this remote community at risk of mosquito-borne diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika. The combination of training of health workers, low-cost ecological ovillanta to destroy the second generation of mosquitoes, and community engagement ensured the project met local needs and fostered collaboration and participation of the community, which can help improve sustainability. The ovillanta intervention and methodology may be modified to target other species such as Culex, should it be established that such mosquitoes carry Zika virus in addition to Aedes.

Highlights

  • There is increasing concern about mosquito-borne disease, amplified by the recent Latin American outbreaks of Zika virus, which have raised new alarm about their rapid spread and illness in vulnerable populations[1]

  • Plus the yellow fever virus, are transmitted mainly by mosquitoes of the Aedes genus, the African species Aedes aegypti, one of the most aggressive vector mosquitoes capable of transmitting these illnesses, and to a lesser level the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, which prefers to bite during the day and is emerging as one of the most adaptable insects in the world[3,4,5]

  • Our project was enabled by intersectoral collaboration between academic researchers, local health authorities from the Ministry of Health Vector Control Programme of Guatemala. international collaborators in Canada, Guatemala and Mexico, and community members

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is increasing concern about mosquito-borne disease, amplified by the recent Latin American outbreaks of Zika virus, which have raised new alarm about their rapid spread and illness in vulnerable populations[1]. The Americas have seen invasion of dengue virus, chikungunya virus, and most recently the Zika virus, causing dangerous outbreaks and subsequent morbidity and mortality that have proved difficult to control in a sustainable manner. All of these viruses, plus the yellow fever virus, are transmitted mainly by mosquitoes of the Aedes genus (subgender: Stegomyia), the African species Aedes aegypti, one of the most aggressive vector mosquitoes capable of transmitting these illnesses, and to a lesser level the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, which prefers to bite during the day and is emerging as one of the most adaptable insects in the world[3,4,5]. I would suggest refocusing on the role of ovitraps, and conducting a more comprehensive literature review of different ovitraps currently on the market, their limitations and strengths

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call