Abstract

Image-guided surgery, prosthetic-based virtual planning, 3D printing, and CAD/CAM technology are changing head and neck ablative and reconstructive surgical oncology. Due to quality-of-life improvement, dental implant rehabilitation could be considered in every patient treated with curative intent. Accurate implant placement is mandatory for prosthesis long-term stability and success in oncologic patients. We present a prospective study, with a novel workflow, comprising 11 patients reconstructed with free flaps and 56 osseointegrated implants placed in bone flaps or remnant jaws (iliac crest, fibula, radial forearm, anterolateral thigh). Starting from CT data and jaw plaster model scanning, virtual dental prosthesis was designed. Then prosthetically driven dental implacement was also virtually planned and transferred to the patient by means of intraoperative infrared optical navigation (first four patients), and a combination of conventional static teeth supported 3D-printed acrylic guide stent, intraoperative dynamic navigation, and augmented reality for final intraoperative verification (last 7 patients). Coronal, apical, and angular deviation between virtual surgical planning and final guided intraoperative position was measured on each implant. There is a clear learning curve for surgeons when applying guided methods. Initial only-navigated cases achieved low accuracy but were comparable to non-guided freehand positioning due to jig registration instability. Subsequent dynamic navigation cases combining highly stable acrylic static guides as reference and registration markers result in the highest accuracy with a 1–1.5-mm deviation at the insertion point. Smartphone-based augmented reality visualization is a valuable tool for intraoperative visualization and final verification, although it is still a difficult technique for guiding surgery. A fixed screw-retained ideal dental prosthesis was achieved in every case as virtually planned. Implant placement, the final step in free flap oncological reconstruction, could be accurately planned and placed with image-guided surgery, 3D printing, and CAD/CAM technology. The learning curve could be overcome with preclinical laboratory training, but virtually designed and 3D-printed tracer registration stability is crucial for accurate and predictable results. Applying these concepts to our difficult oncologic patient subgroup with deep anatomic alterations ended in comparable results as those reported in non-oncologic patients.

Highlights

  • Head and neck tumor treatment entails an irreversible anatomical distortion and a loss of essential functions such as chewing, swallowing, or phonation

  • We placed a total of 56 implants, 25 in the upper jaw, and 31 in the lower jaw. 18 implants were inserted into the fibula bone, 6 into the iliac crest, and 32 in the patient remnant bone; 15 implants were placed in irradiated bone (1 fibula and the ALT with vastus lateralis case)

  • Osseointegration was uneventful and the initial group of four patients ended with adequate screw-retained implantsupported prosthesis. To overcome this stability problem, we introduced the static CAIS (sCAIS) in our study, based on a 3D-printed teeth-supported surgical guide that stabilized the fiducial markers for accurate registration and navigation and demonstrated to be a good alternative for implant placement if needed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Head and neck tumor treatment entails an irreversible anatomical distortion and a loss of essential functions such as chewing, swallowing, or phonation. Functional restoration of the oral cavity is one of the main challenges for head and neck surgeons. In this context, microsurgical free flaps enable the three-dimensional (3D) repair of orofacial defects on an individual basis to restore lost tissue. Urken et al [3] were the pioneer in fitting implants immediately during the hard tissue reconstructive procedure with DCIA flap (deep circumflex iliac artery, the iliac crest flap). Shape reconstruction using flaps and function restoration with implant-supported prostheses have become wellestablished methods

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.