Abstract
Structures of the inclusion compounds of 1,1,2,2-tetraphenylethane-1,2-diol with 2,6-lutidine (1), 3,5-lutidine (2) and 3,4-lutidine (3) have been determined. Crystal data: (1) C26H22O2·C7H9N, Mr= 473.62, triclinic, P, a= 9.414(7), b= 11.191(4), c= 13.328(18)A, α= 82.81 (7), β= 70.78(12), γ= 86.44(4)°, V= 1315.2 A3, Z= 2, Dm= 1.17, Dc= 1.20 g cm–3, λ(Mo-Kα)= 0.710 69 A, µ= 0.40 cm–1, F(000)= 504. (2) C26H22O2·(C7H9N)2, Mr= 580.77, triclinic, P, a= 12.099(4), b= 17.869(5), c= 17.873(10)A, α= 64.65(3), β= 87.32(4), γ= 75.25(2)°, V= 3368.4 A3, Z= 4, Dm= 1.12, Dc= 1.15 g cm–3, λ(Mo-Kα)= 0.71069 A, µ= 0.64 cm–1, F(000)= 1240. (3) C26H22O2·(C7H9N)2, Mr= 580.77, triclinic, P, a= 9.163(4), b= 11.740(4), c= 17.721 (7)A, α= 69.50(3), β= 74.22(4), γ= 73.09(4)°, V= 1677.2 A3, Z= 2, Dm= 1.14, Dc= 1.15 g cm–3, λ(Mo-Kα)= 0.710 69 A, µ= 0.38 cm–1, F(000)= 620. The final R values at 293 K were (1) 0.043, (2) 0.070 and (3) 0.067 for 3382, 8561 and 4828 unique reflections. Strong host–guest hydrogen bonding is observed in all structures, O ⋯ N distances are between 2.664 and 2.889 A. Thermal analysis revealed the strength of binding of the guest molecules and a competition experiment showed that 3,5-lutidine is preferentially included over 2,6-lutidine.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.