Abstract
Sampling can be used as a method for urban tree inventory estimation. There are several sampling methods available, and choices for urban tree inventory methods vary according to the place to be studied and the urban tree conditions. This study compared the results of simple and stratified random sampling methods with those of a total district tree census. The simple random sampling error was 17%, and the coefficient of variation was 47%. The stratified random sampling errors varied from 19% to 60%, and their coefficients of variation ranged from 32% to 70%, depending on the stratum. The Shannon diversity index (SDI) was low in the census (3.07), as in the simple random sampling (1.27). The total number of trees and the number of trees per kilometer of sidewalk calculated by the simple random sampling were similar to those obtained by the census. Because the sampling error obtained by stratified random sampling was higher than for that obtained by simple random sampling, the use of stratified random sampling was not advantageous when compared with simple random sampling. Furthermore, the stratified random sampling procedure was more complex.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
