Effects of Different Amounts of Codominant Stem Subordination on the Growth and Aesthetics ofAcer rubrum‘October Glory’

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCodominant stems are a common condition of concern on landscape trees. Understanding the impact of varying degrees of stem reduction can assist practitioners in making informed pruning decisions.MethodsTo determine this, a single reduction or removal cut was made on each pair of codominant stems on medium-agedAcer rubrum‘October Glory’ at approximately 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the diameter relative to the basal diameter at the shared union or left as nonpruned controls. Changes in stem diameter ratio, trunk diameter growth, sprout production, wound closure, and aesthetics were documented for 4 years starting in 2020.ResultsStem diameter ratio was significantly reduced in codominant stems pruned to a relative diameter of 50% or 75% after a single growing season. The 75% treatment reduced growth for 2 growing seasons. There were no significant differences in change of stem diameter ratio with any treatment after 3 growing seasons. Larger pruning cuts resulted in the growth of more sprouts and more exposed wood after 3 years. Aesthetics of trees following pruning were acceptable for nonpruned, 25%, and 50% treatments in all years but were rated as not acceptable or moderately acceptable for 75% and 100% treatments after 2 growing seasons. Trees with the 75% treatment became aesthetically acceptable after 3 growing seasons.ConclusionsPruning codominant stems ofA. rubrum‘October Glory’ with a cut that is 50% or 75% the diameter of the basal diameter at the shared union is appropriate at reducing stem diameter ratio, minimizing exposed wood, and maintaining overall aesthetic appearance after 2 to 3 years.