Abstract
This work compares the effectiveness of different biogrout agents to improve the mechanical properties (strength and stiffness) of two sandy soils. Based on the results of unconfined compressive strength tests for different curing times (3-180 days), the results obtained from microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation using two bacteria (Sporosarcina pasteurii and Idiomarina insuliasalsae) are compared with employing urease to promote calcium carbonate precipitation and the use of the biopolymer xanthan gum (3-28 days). Additionally, the methodologies of calcite precipitation and the use of xanthan gum are also analyzed by examining scanning electron microscopy images. For a curing time of 28 days, the results show that the use of urease is the best of the three bio-based methodologies to improve sand, while the least efficient methodology is the use of the biopolymer xanthan gum. The use of both bacteria increases the unconfined compressive strength during the curing time (until 180 days); regarding the use of urease and xanthan gum, the unconfined compressive strength remains approximately constant for a curing time longer than 7-14 days. In terms of stiffness, the use of the bacteria Idiomarina insuliasalsae and urease result in a better improvement, while the use of the bacteria Sporosarcina pasteurii and xanthan gum has only a marginal effect on the stiffness.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call