Comparison of the radiation protection effect of different radiation protection aprons made of different materials

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the performance of new generation protection aprons as alternative to conventional lead aprons regarding their radiation protection effectiveness. Method and materialsRadiation protection aprons made of lead-containing and lead-free materials from a total of seven companies were compared. Furthermore, different lead equivalent values of 0.25, 0.35 and 0.5 mm were compared. For quantitative assessment, radiation attenuation was determined with increasing voltage in steps of 20 kV from 70 kV up to 130 kV. ResultsNew generation aprons and conventional protection lead aprons showed a similar shielding performance at lower tube voltages below 90 kVp. When tube voltage was increased above 90 kVp, significant (p < 0.05) differences between the three apron types were observed, with conventional lead material as best shielding performer over lead composite and lead-free aprons. ConclusionWe observed a similar radiation protection performance between conventional lead aprons and new generation aprons at low intensity radiation workplaces, with lead aprons being dominant for all energies. Only new generation aprons of 0.5 mm thickness would adequately replace 0.25 and 0.35 mm conventional lead aprons. For healthy radiation protection, the possibility of using weight-reduced X-ray aprons is very limited.