Abstract

Objective To compare the application effects of percutaneous tracheotomy and the traditional tracheotomy for patients in ICU. Methods From February 2015 to June 2016, 56 patients in ICU of the First Hospital of Ninghai County were selected in the research and randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table, with 28 cases in each group.The traditional group received traditional tracheotomy.The percutaneous group received the percutaneous tracheotomy.The surgical blood loss, operative time, incision length, scar area, incision healing time, mechanical ventilation time, survival rate and incision infection, subcutaneous emphysema, trachea collapse and other complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operative blood loss, operative time, incision length, scar area, incision healing time, mechanical ventilation time in percutaneous group were (3.14±0.15)mL, (10.02±3.53)min, (1.52±1.52)cm, (1.18±0.12)cm2, (3.53±0.44)d, (5.73±1.13)d, respectively, which in the control group were (7.24±1.91)mL, (30.98±11.72)min, (5.26±5.26)cm, (5.72±1.95)cm2, (7.46±1.25)d, (5.67±1.82)d, respectively, the blood loss, operative time, incision length, operation scar area, incision healing time between the two groups had statistically significant differences (t=8.635, 8.052, 8.155, 8.742, 9.251, all P<0.05). The survival rate of the two groups was 100.0%.The incidence rate of incision infection, subcutaneous emphysema, trachea collapse in the percutaneous group was 17.86%, which was significantly lower than 64.29% in the traditional group, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=15.014, P<0.05). Conclusion Percutaneous tracheotomy and the traditional tracheotomy have certain effect for patients in ICU, compared with traditional tracheotomy, percutaneous tracheotomy has less blood loss, less operation time, can reduce the complications, and can replace traditional tracheotomy for rescue and treatment for ICU patients. Key words: Tracheotomy; Respiration, artificial; Intensive care units; Infection; Subcutaneous emphysema; Controlled clinical trial

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.