Comparison of HOTV optotypes and Lea Symbols: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

PurposeTo report the findings of our systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the completion time and testing timeof visual acuity testing using Lea Symbols or HOTV optotypes. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. ResultsThe completion rate for HOTV optotypes and Lea Symbols visual acuity testing was reported for 7,948 patients (average age, 3.59 years; age range, 2-17; 49.96% females). The 3-year-olds’ completion rate of HOTV was 74.09% (47.93%-93.29%), compared with a Lea Symbols completion rate of 77.80% (53.93%-94.57%). The 4-year-olds’ completion rate was 88.20% (63.48%-99.73%) for HOTV and 90.118% (67.42%-99.90%) for Lea Symbols. In 3-year-olds, the mean testing time was 118.33 ± 6.54 seconds for HOTV and 120.33 ± 6.53 seconds for Lea Symbols (P < 0.0001). The difference in testing times in the 4-year-old age group was also statistically significant (86.98 ± 6.12 seconds for HOTV and 94.32 ± 6.57 seconds for Lea symbols) (P < 0.0001). ConclusionsThere was a statistically significant difference in the testing times between the HOTV optotypes and Lea Symbols in both the 3- and 4-year-old age groups; however, the difference of 2-7 seconds on average is unlikely to be clinically significant,. Testing speed and completion rate improve with age for both tests.