Comparison of conjoined tendon-preserving posterior approach and conventional posterolateral approach in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in the elderly: A multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study

Abstract

BackgroundFemoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common traumatic injuries in the elderly. The conjoined tendon-preserving posterior (CPP) approach was developed as a modification of the conventional posterolateral (PL) approach in hemiarthroplasty (HA) for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) to reduce postoperative dislocation. We hypothesized that the CPP approach would result in fewer dislocations and similar functional and radiographic outcomes compared to the PL approach. Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective multicenter (TRON group) study. We evaluated the rate of complications, and functional and radiographic outcomes for patients aged >65 years who underwent HA via the PL approach or the CPP approach from 2017 to 2019 and followed up for at least 24 months. To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, a propensity score-matching algorithm was used in a 1:1 ratio. ResultsWe identified 135 patients who underwent HA via the PL approach and 135 patients via the CPP approach. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 ± 14.0 months. The incidence of dislocation was 6 in 135 patients (4.4%) in the PL group and 0 in 135 patients (0%) in the CPP group, and there was significant difference (p = 0.04). Operation time was equivalent between the two groups (73.1 ± 30.4 vs. 71.8 ± 30.0 min; p = 0.72). The rate of varus insertion of stems in the PL group lower than that in the CPP group (19.3% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.01). Postoperative Parker's mobility score was similar between the two groups at 12 months follow-up (6.17 vs. 6.27; p = 0.81). ConclusionThe CPP approach showed a significantly lower dislocation rate, similar functional outcome and more varus stem insertions compared with the PL approach in this retrospective study.