Voies d’abord directe latérale versus postéro-latérale dans les hémi-arthrosplasties pour fracture du col fémoral

Abstract

IntroductionAdopting the direct lateral (DL) instead of the posterolateral (PL) approach in hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients could lower the rate of prosthetic dislocation. However, little is known about how the approach influences the functional outcome. HypothesisWe hypothesized that both approaches would give comparable results. Material and methodsIn a prospective cohort study, we enrolled 185 hips (183 patients, 128 women, median age 84 years) with a displaced FNF. Subjects were assigned to treatment using DL (n=102) or PL approach (n=83) with a hemiarthroplasty (HA). Functional outcome was assessed by Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) index, pain numeric rating scale (PNRS) for pain, mortality and hip complications. Patients were followed-up after 1 year. ResultsThe HHS was 71 (SD 18) in the DL group and 72 (SD 17) in the PL group (P=0.59). We found no difference in WOMAC, PNRS and mortality. Seven patients (6.9%) in the DL group and 11 patients (13.3%) in the PL group had undergone a major re-operation (adjusted OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.18–2.07; P=0.23). DiscussionIn this prospective cohort study, patients treated with HA for FNF using either the DL or PL approaches had comparable functional outcome after 1 year. The PL approach had a tendency towards a higher re-operation rate. Type of studyProspective cohort study. Level of proofLevel 2.