Abstract
Viruses are a frequent cause of self-limited diarrhea, with more severe outcomes in immunocompromised patients. This study aimed to compare the performance of Real-Time RT-PCR to chromatographic immunoassays (CIAs) for detecting the major gastrointestinal viruses in human stool. This study was conducted at the University Hospital of Split, Croatia, from October 2023 to May 2024. Stool samples were simultaneously analyzed with CIA (Acro Biotech Rotavirus and Adenovirus Combo Rapid Test Cassette, USA and JusChek Norovirus Rapid Test Cassette, China) and Real-Time RT-PCR (AccuPower Diarrhea V1&V2 Real-Time RT-PCR, Bioneer, Republic of Korea), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and overall percent agreement (OPA) were calculated. For norovirus, CIA had a low PPA (25%), indicating that it missed 75% of norovirus-positive cases identified by RT-PCR. Adenovirus detection by CIA showed poor agreement with RT-PCR (PPA 0%; NPA 100%). Rotavirus detection presented a relatively better performance with CIA (PPA 90.9% and OPA 84.13%). However, the presence of false positives (15.8%) highlights the need for confirmatory RT-PCR testing. One specimen was sapovirus-RT-PCR-positive, marking the first documented case from human specimens in Croatia. Although CIA provided rapid results, limitations regarding reliability highlight the value of RT-PCR, particularly in the case of ambiguous clinical cases with negative antigenic test results and newly emerged viruses. A two-step diagnostic approach, with initial CIA screening followed by confirmatory RT-PCR, could balance cost-effectiveness with diagnostic accuracy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call