Abstract

This study presents numerical investigation on the performance of S-shaped air intake normal and aggressive diffuser with 22% length reduction. Both models have same area ratio of 3.1 with different total length, turning angle and radius of curvature. The numerical investigation was implemented using CFD simulation by ANSYS-FLUENT 15 software. The inlet Reynold number was 4×104 and turbulence intensity 4.1%. The performance evaluation was performed throw evaluation the static pressure coefficient, pressure loss coefficient, distortion coefficient and static pressure wall coefficient. The numerical results show that the performance in the case of aggressive S-shaped diffuser has been reduced compared to the normal S-shaped diffuser. This reduction resulting from the early flow separation and increase of the separation zone due to the high curvature of top and bottom surfaces of aggressive S-shaped diffuser. The results show that the static pressure recovery coefficient decreased by 31%, the total pressure loss coefficient and distortion coefficient increased by 9.5% and 8.2%, respectively, compared to the S-shaped diffuser. The static pressure wall coefficient on the top and bottom surfaces was dropped with the aggressive S-shaped diffuser.

Highlights

  • In aero engines, the air intakes represent the main component of breathing of engine

  • The results show that the static pressure recovery was improved by 47% and total loss coefficient was reduced by 56%

  • The numerical results show that the CPR has been reduced by 31%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The air intakes represent the main component of breathing of engine. The S-shaped diffuser has a widely use compared to other types of intakes [1]. The size and weight constraints encourage to use shorter S-shaped diffuser. S-shaped diffusers have increased cross-sectional areas and centerline curvatures with the flow direction. Maren et al [3] applied a new concept to reduce the length of S-duct, called integrated concept (IC), and compared with a base design. This concept represented by replacing the first row of low profile vane from the first bearing engine rotor by struts. The results show that total pressure loss base design is 4.4% and the total pressure loss with IC is 4.3%

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call