Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Gallstone Preservation and Cholecystectomy

Abstract

In recent years, with the change of people's diet structure, the incidence of gallbladder stones has increased gradually. Gallbladder stones is a common clinical disease, the common clinical treatment methods are gallstone preservation and cholecystectomy. Objective: To compare the clinical effects of gallbladder stone removal and cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallbladder stones. Methods: The 72 patients with gallbladder stones in our hospital were divided into the gallstone preservation group and the cholecystectomy group, 36 cases in each group. The surgical conditions and treatment effects of the two groups were statistically analyzed, and the two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months. Results: The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative bowel movement recovery time, and diet recovery time in the gallstone preservation group were shorter than those in the cholecystectomy group. Compared with the cholecystectomy group, the gallstone preservation group had lower complication rate and higher hospitalization costs, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). During the follow-up period of the two groups, the B-ultrasound in the cholecystectomy group was normal, and 4 cases (11.1%) in the gallstone preservation group had recurrence of stones. Conclusion: Gallstone preservation and cholecystectomy have their own characteristics in the treatment of gallbladder stones and have good clinical effects. They need to be appropriately selected according to their own conditions and personal wishes in patients with gallbladder stones.