Comparative study of weathering signatures in felsic igneous rocks of Hong Kong

Abstract

Mineralogical, petrographical and geochemical characteristics of two weathered profiles, derived from rhyolitic tuff and granitic rocks under humid conditions, were studied by atomic absorption spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffractometry. The granitic profile is derived from medium-grained, equigranular monzogranitic parent rocks and typically contains corestones, whereas the pyroclastic profile is derived from rhyolitic crystal-vitric tuffs, which were subjected to deuteric alteration prior to weathering. The two parent rocks contain similar primary mineral constituents and display similar sequential changes in response to weathering at mineral scale. However, samples of the granitic profile reveal more pronounced intergranular and transgranular microcracks and wider grain boundaries compared with samples of the same weathering grade from the pyroclastic profile. Sesquioxide networks and veins are more common in the pyroclastic profile than in the granitic profile.Special emphasis is given to the type, abundance and distribution of clay minerals within the weathered profiles. Kaolinite, halloysite, illite and interstratified smectite are ubiquitous clay-size minerals of both profiles. However, the abundance of clay minerals varies significantly within each profile as well as between profiles. The granitic profile is dominated by halloysite regardless of the degree of weathering, whereas halloysite is the dominant clay mineral only in moderately to highly decomposed samples of the pyroclastic profile. The relative abundance of illite in the granitic profile is rather low (less than 10%) and more stable than the profile compared to the pyroclastic profile where illite is the dominant clay mineral in fresh to moderately decomposed samples. In general, as the intensity of weathering increases, the relative abundance ratios of halloysite to kaolinite and illite to kaolin decrease.Parent rock normalized chemical variation diagrams reveal that as the intensity of weathering increases, Ca, Na, K, Rb and Sr contents decrease, whereas Al, Mg, Mn, Ti, Cu, Cr, Ni, Ba, Sc and LOI contents increase. Although these variations can easily be explained by decomposition of feldspar grains and formation of sesquioxides and clay minerals, overall chemical trends are not sufficiently systematic to allow prediction of theweathering degree of a given sample based solely on its chemical composition. In general, the granitic profile has been developed under better-drained and more hydrous conditions compared to the pyroclastic profile. Microenvironmental conditions, which are significantly different between the two profiles, ultimately control the type and abundance of clay minerals and the distribution of sesquioxides, and thus govern the level of microfabric heterogeneity in weathered profiles.