Abstract
A comparison of dry and wet release methods for surface micromachining of metallic structures, such as RF MEMS switches, test structures, bridges, and cantilevers is presented. The dry release process is opti- mized by varying the concentration of O2 and CF4 plasma and RF power. The plasma ashing of the sacrificial layer typically results in damage to metallic structures or stress-related deformation due to rise in temperature (>80°C). A wet release process using critical point drying (CPD) has been investigated to realize gold-electro- plated structures with reduced residual stress. The CPD, being a low-temperature (31.1°C) process, is more suitable for compliant structures without any deformation. © 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.