Abstract
In the deep geological disposal repository of high-level radioactive waste, buffer/backfill materials typically consist of compacted bentonite block and granular bentonite. As these materials undergo a long-term hydration, it is anticipated that the two forms of bentonite materials (i.e. compacted bentonite powder (CBP) and granular bentonite (GB)) are expected to exhibit differing hydro-mechanical behaviors due to the differences in their structures. This work aims to investigate the differences in swelling pressure and compressibility through a series of swelling pressure tests, compression tests and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) tests. The experimental results demonstrated that swelling pressure curves of the CBP specimens showed higher first peak values and more pronounced collapse than those of the GB specimens at a given dry density, regardless of vapor-water hydration or liquid-water hydration. The final swelling pressures of the two materials were similar at the same dry density, suggesting an independent correlation between swelling pressure and dry density. At the high suction range, the compression curves exhibited an obvious bi-linear pattern for the CBP specimens and a significant nonlinearity for the GB specimens. Meanwhile, the CBP specimens presented higher pre-consolidation pressures and larger compression indices than the GB specimens at a given suction. As suction decreased, the compression curves of the two materials gradually approached each other and their differences were reduced accordingly. After reaching saturation, a good consistency between them was observed whether for final swelling pressure or compressibility. Pore structure analysis revealed that the two materials both presented an initially double structure, and their differences were primarily manifested at the macrostructural level. Eventually, the differences in swelling pressure or compression curves of the two materials were well interpreted by combining microstructural evolutions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.