Abstract
Short-stem implants offer several advantages, including the preservation of bone stock and a physiological load transfer in the subtrochanteric area. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of short stem and traditional stem during midterm follow-up. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 50 patients with Fitmore and CLS stems. Clinical assessment was performed by Harris hip score; additionally, thigh pain was assessed at six months, one year, and the latest follow-up. The following radiological parameters were evaluated: stem alignment, presence of radiolucent lines and osteolysis around the stem, stem subsidence, cortical hypertrophy, femoral stress-shielding, pedestal formation at the tip of the stem, calcar resorption, heterotopic ossification, and implant loosening. The mean follow-up duration was 8.4 ± 2.1years in the CLS group and 7.6 ± 2.2years in the Fitmore group. The mean HHS improved from 43.0 ± 3.3 to 93.2 ± 2.5 for the CLS group and from 43.2 ± 4.4 to 93.6 ± 3.2 for the Fitmore group, without any statistical differences between the two groups. Thigh pain disappeared in all patients in the Fitmore group, while it persisted in 8% of the patients in the CLS group. There was a significant difference in the level of cortical hypertrophy between the two groups, with 28% in the Fitmore group compared to 12% in the CLS group. No statistically significant difference was observed for other radiological parameters. Both short stems and standard stems demonstrated stable fixation and satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call