Abstract

This study uses a process lifecycle inventory (LCI) to compare the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations using different sources for CO2 and to non-CO2 EOR methods. All EOR techniques were compared to the base case of natural-source CO2-EOR, which had net emissions of 0.52±0.03 metric tons of CO2-e per barrel of oil recovered (t/bbl) (85.1±4.9gCO2-e/MJ oil (g/MJ)), the same as the net emissions of 0.52±0.02t/bbl (84.3±3.0g/MJ) when using CO2 derived from a coal-fueled synthetic natural gas (SNG) plant. Net emissions were lowered to 0.36±0.03t/bbl (58.5±5.2g/MJ) for EOR using CO2 derived from a coal-fed Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant. Net emissions were further reduced to 0.18±0.11t/bbl (28.6±18.7g/MJ) using switchgrass grown on marginal land in an IGCC plant. Similar to coal, net emissions were 0.34±0.03t/bbl (55.3±5.5g/MJ) for EOR using CO2 derived from a Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) plant, and 0.39±0.03t/bbl (63.3±4.4g/MJ) when using livestock manure biogas for NGCC. Net emissions of methane- and nitrogen-EOR were 10–15% greater than for natural-source CO2-EOR. For the allocations used in this study, all sources of CO2 derived from IGCC or NGCC plants resulted in between about 25% and 60% lower net CO2-e emissions per barrel of oil recovered compared to natural-source CO2-EOR, and were also approximately 25–60% lower than average domestic U.S. oil lifecycle emissions of 0.50±0.02t/bbl (82.4±2.5g/MJ). These results suggest that coal and biomass IGCC CO2-EOR, as well as natural gas and biogas NGCC CO2-EOR, may be alternatives for reducing GHG emissions associated with fossil fuel use during the slow transition from fossil fuels to other energy sources.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call