Abstract
Aims: To compare maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) measured by a digital manometer and by an inspiratory muscle training (IMT) device and to evaluate hemodynamic changes after measurements.Methods: The sample included male and female individuals older than 18 years admitted to an intensive care unit who were hemodynamically stable, not being treated with vasoactive drugs or sedated, intubated or tracheostomized, and who were in the process of being weaned from mechanical ventilation. MIP was measured by both devices on three different occasions, with an occlusion time of 20 seconds and a 5-minute interval between measurements. The following parameters were assessed: respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, and respiratory rate before and after each measurement by each device. The statistical analysis was made in the Statistical Analysis System and the R Project for Statistical Computing V. 3.1.2 softwares, using the ANOVA and the Wilcoxon tests.Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. The mean value obtained for MIP was -46.22 centimeters of water (cmH2O) in the digital manometer and -13.15 cmH2O (p<0.001) in the IMT device. Heart rate showed a significant increase (p<0.0001) both before and after all measurements in both devices. Mean arterial pressure showed a statistically significant difference only before and after the first measurement by the digital manometer and before and after the second measurement by the IMT device (p<0.001). The respiratory rate oscillated significantly before and after the three measurements by both devices (p<0.0001). The hemodynamic parameters remained within reference values after MIP measurements.Conclusions: The digital manometer recorded a higher MIP than that measured by the IMT device. The hemodynamic parameter values oscillated in both devices, but they remained within the normal range and were not clinically significant.
Highlights
Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de iteresse relevantes ao conteúdo deste estudo
The safety of mobilisation and its effect on haemodynamic and respiratory status of intensive care patients
Summary
Áurea Gonçalves Ferreira, Fabieli Vicente, Ligia dos Santos Roceto Ratti, Rodrigo Marques Tonella, Antonio Luis Eiras Falcão, Ana Paula Ragonete dos Anjos , Luciana Castilho de Figueirêdo. Objetivos: Comparar valores de pressão inspiratória máxima (PImáx) aferidos por um manovacuômetro digital e por um dispositivo eletrônico de treinamento muscular inspiratório e avaliar as repercussões hemodinâmicas após as medidas. Pressão arterial média e frequência respiratória antes e após cada medida para cada equipamento utilizado. A pressão arterial média apresentou diferença estatisticamente significativa somente entre antes e após a primeira medida obtida pelo manovacuômetro digital, e entre antes e após a segunda medida obtida com o dispositivo de treinamento muscular inspiratório (p
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
