Abstract

This article positions participatory action learning and action research (PALAR) as a preferred methodology for community-university partnerships to achieve a holistic outcome that benefits the common interest. Evidence for this claim is illustrated through case studies of two community engagement programs, one in South Africa and the other in Australia. The South African study explains how relationships, reflection and recognition (the three R’s of PALAR) are important elements that promote a truly participatory approach to knowledge creation and practical improvement in social circumstances. The Australian study then highlights what can be achieved. It does this by showing the potential for PALAR participants to learn how to design and implement a community engagement program, and how to cascade their own learning into their community to improve educational opportunities. Both studies demonstrate PALAR’s potential to disrupt traditional understandings of the research process, particularly in terms of researcher–participant relationships. At the same time, both studies identify the challenges arising from the theoretical and practical implications of PALAR as an approach to community development. This article is therefore significant for universities and funding organisations engaging in community-based research and development through partnerships, specifically in contexts of disadvantage. 
 
 Keywords: Participatory action learning and action research, PALAR, community development, community engagement, community partnerships, disadvantaged communities, higher education.

Highlights

  • As a core function of a university, community engagement needs to be embraced by all academics in higher education, enabling research for, and as, social change

  • To provide a context for these case studies, the following section briefly explains the concepts of action learning (AL), action research (AR), participatory action research (PAR), and participatory action learning and action research (PALAR)

  • PALAR integrates what we identify as the three main areas of development: (1) community development; (2) leadership development; and (3) the development of lifelong learning

Read more

Summary

Design four research

3. Subsequent cascading of learning at researchers at tertiary projects using PALAR to university and in the community level using PALAR engage with communities. How can youth be involved most effectively in designing and implementing peer education programs for preventing teen pregnancy?. How can the potential of non-music specialist Grade R practitioners be unlocked most effectively to nurture the musical development of learners?. How can community be involved most effectively in setting up and running a new school?. Workshop focus Principles and processes of Strategies for designing and Writing and publishing the results of (5 days). Via formal workshops at Via formal cascading the two universities events in communities

Concluding workshop
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call