Abstract

Viscoelastic properties are often measured using probe based techniques such as nanoindentation (NI) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Rarely, however, are these methods verified. In this article, we present a method that combines contact mechanics with a viscoelastic model (VEM) composed of springs and dashpots. We further show how to use this model to determine viscoelastic properties from creep curves recorded by a probe based technique. We focus on using the standard linear solid model and the generalized Maxwell model of order 2. The method operates in the range of 0.01 Hz to 1 Hz. Our approach is suitable for rough surfaces by providing a defined contact area using plastic pre-deformation of the material. The very same procedure is used to evaluate AFM based measurements as well as NI measurements performed on polymer samples made from poly(methyl methacrylate) and polycarbonate. The results of these measurements are then compared to those obtained by tensile creep tests also performed on the same samples. It is found that the tensile test results differ considerably from the results obtained by AFM and NI methods. The similarity between the AFM results and NI results suggests that the proposed method is capable of yielding results comparable to NI but with the advantage of the imaging possibilities of AFM. Furthermore, all three methods allowed a clear distinction between PC and PMMA by means of their respective viscoelastic properties.

Highlights

  • Inffeldgasse 23, 8010 Graz, Austria † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available

  • For poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), maps were recorded on 11 positions altogether and for PC, maps were recorded on 16 positions

  • We presented an atomic force microscopy (AFM) based method to measure the viscoelastic properties of polymer materials on the nanometer scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inffeldgasse 23, 8010 Graz, Austria † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. Their surfaces are very rough and wrinkled in appearance. The transversal properties, are even more difficult to detect because of the rough and wrinkled surfaces of the fibers. It is hard to establish a homogeneous and well-defined contact area to test the whole fiber in the transversal direction. With an AFM-based NI (AFM-NI) method it is possible to circumvent the problem of the rough surface by first scanning the sample and selecting a locally smooth and flat region to perform the mechanical test. With classical NI, the detection of viscoelastic properties has already been performed on metals[1] as well as polymers,[2] while AFM has been used to study the viscoelasticity of polymer membranes,[3] gels and cells.[4,5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call