Abstract
Due to specialisation and the division of labour non-meteorologists cannot but take seriously the findings of environmental scientists. But this only holds true when those involved in ecological studies are able to freely conduct their research. That relatively rather low bar, sadly, has not been reached in recent debates in this field. The point is when scientists, or specialists, in a given discipline are free to present their theories and evidence, then, laypersons would be well-advised to take into account their findings. But when scholars are not allowed to do so then the 'findings' of the majority of them must be taken with a grain of salt. The present paper attempts to find our way forward in this not only non-scientific, but anti-scientific milieu.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
