Abstract

This article investigates projected changes in temperature and water cycle extremes at 1.5°C of global warming, and highlights the role of land processes and land-use changes (LUCs) for these projections. We provide new comparisons of changes in climate at 1.5°C versus 2°C based on empirical sampling analyses of transient simulations versus simulations from the ‘Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts’ (HAPPI) multi-model experiment. The two approaches yield similar overall results regarding changes in climate extremes on land, and reveal a substantial difference in the occurrence of regional extremes at 1.5°C versus 2°C. Land processes mediated through soil moisture feedbacks and land-use forcing play a major role for projected changes in extremes at 1.5°C in most mid-latitude regions, including densely populated areas in North America, Europe and Asia. This has important implications for low-emissions scenarios derived from integrated assessment models (IAMs), which include major LUCs in ambitious mitigation pathways (e.g. associated with increased bioenergy use), but are also shown to differ in the simulated LUC patterns. Biogeophysical effects from LUCs are not considered in the development of IAM scenarios, but play an important role for projected regional changes in climate extremes, and are thus of high relevance for sustainable development pathways.This article is part of the theme issue ‘The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.

Highlights

  • The 2015 Paris Agreement aims to hold the average global warming compared to pre-industrial levels to ‘well below 2°C’, and ‘to pursue efforts’ to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels [1]

  • We focus on six regions which have been shown to display substantial changes between 1.5°C and 2°C of global warming for the considered extremes [5,8], based on domains from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Extremes (IPCC SREX) [33, ch. 3]: the Amazon region (AMZ), Central Europe (CEU), Central North America (CNA), Eastern Asia (EAS), the Mediterranean region (MED) and Northern Europe (NEU)

  • New analyses comparing ESR-derived estimates of changes in extremes at 1.5°C and 2°C of global warming with output from simulations of the HAPPI multi-model experiment reveal that the two approaches yield similar overall results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The 2015 Paris Agreement aims to hold the average global warming compared to pre-industrial levels to ‘well below 2°C’, and ‘to pursue efforts’ to limit it to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels [1]. As highlighted in the introduction, results have shown a surprisingly high degree of linearity in the regional changes in extreme event intensity at different levels of global warming (from pre-industrial conditions to more than 4°C of global warming) based on multi-model means [5,8]. These results are consistent with analyses suggesting a robust forced response pattern in projections of changes in temperature and precipitation extremes [20]. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)/Bureau of Meteorology (BOM), Australia bcc-csm

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis
SREX regions considered in this study
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call